How will the NAIS Potentially Affect Horse Owners?

Throughout my Internet travels over the past couple of months I have come across many posts and articles regarding the National Animal Identification System (NAIS). At the present time, the NAIS is a voluntary program instituted by the USDA. It is described on the USDA website as a:

National disease response network built to protect your animals, your neighbors, and your economic livelihood against the devastation of a foreign animal disease outbreak.

Additionally the USDA website states that:

To protect the health of U.S. livestock and poultry and the economic well-being of those industries, we must be able to quickly and effectively trace an animal disease to its source.

There are three parts to this program, which are Premises Registrations, Animal Identification and Animal Tracing.

Originally when I read all the negative posts and editorials regarding this program I really didn’t understand why horse people were so against it. The USDA states that it is for “disease tracing” and how could that be bad? I am all for eradicating disease; who isn’t?With this in mind, I decided to do a little research about it since it is such a “hot topic”. I now understand what a negative impact this program can potentially have on not only horse owners, but on all small farming operations. It is an extremely important issue that can have devastating consequences if it would become a required mandate to all animal owners. Tagging or “microchipping” all animals on farms, documenting any time they leave the premises, and reporting all deaths, sales, and purchases are only a few of the requirements that could be instituted. The website, and particularly a post on the titled “Why You Should Oppose the USDA’s Mandatory Property and Animal Surveillance Program” give interesting and thought provoking information about the possible implications of the NAIS. For those of you interested, it is worth taking a look. I found it very enlightening.

3 Responses to How will the NAIS Potentially Affect Horse Owners?

  1. Henwhisperer says:

    Welcome to the world of the awake!

    One other thing that you might not have understood is that by getting a premises registration number you give up full property rights to your land. They call it “premises” for a reason. Google up How to become a serf in one easy step, by Doreen Hannes.

    You might like my blog as well.

    You can join a state specific list group on Yahoo to fight NAIS. And fight we must.

  2. Thomas Jones says:

    Legal Defense Fund Moves to Stop Animal ID Program;

    Files Intent to Sue Letter with USDA and

    Michigan Department of Agriculture

    Falls Church, Virginia, (May 15, 2008) — Attorneys for the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund today sent a Notice of Intent to Sue letter to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Michigan Department of Agriculture (MDA) over implementation of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), a plan to electronically track every livestock animal in the country.

    The Notice asks the USDA and MDA to “immediately suspend the funding and implementation of NAIS,” and “fully and fairly examine” whether there is even a need for such a program.

    Taaron Meikle, Fund president, said that contrary to USDA’s claim, NAIS will do nothing to protect the health of livestock and poultry. “At a time when food safety and costs are a concern, the USDA has spent over $118 million to promote a program that will burden everyone from pleasure horse owners to ranchers and small farmers to individuals who raise a few chickens or steers on their own land for their own use.”

    Once fully implemented, the NAIS program would require every person who owns even one livestock or poultry animal (a single chicken or a pet pony) to register their property with the state and federal government, to tag each animal, and to report “events” to a database within 24 hours. Reportable events would include such things as a private sale, a state fair, or a horse show.

    The Notice charges that USDA has never published rules regarding NAIS, in violation of the Federal Administrative Procedures Act; has never performed an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assessment as required by the National Environmental Policy Act; is in violation of the Regulatory Flexibility Act that requires them to analyze proposed rules for their impact on small entities and local governments; and violates religious freedoms guaranteed by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

    “We also think there are constitutional issues at stake here,” Meikle noted. “The requirement to use electronic ear tags or RFID chips violates the religious beliefs of some farmers, such as the Amish, and provisions in a memorandum of understanding between the USDA and the MDA could violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution by requiring the state to stop and inspect vehicles carrying livestock without a warrant or probable cause.”

    The MDA has implemented the first two stages of NAIS –property registration and animal identification – for all cattle and farmers across the state as part of its mandatory bovine tuberculosis disease control program, which is mandated by a grant from the USDA.

    “While touted as a disease control program, the NAIS will drive many small farmers out of business” Meikle noted, “and burden every person who owns even one horse, chicken, cow, goat, sheep, pig, llama, alpaca, or other livestock animal with expensive and intrusive government regulations.”

    Joe Golimbieski, a farmer from Standish, Michigan and Fund member, explains: “The cost of the tags is just the start. We’re at the mercy of whatever price the stockyards charge to do the tagging. And our farm doesn’t have extra employees to deal with paperwork. NAIS is likely to put us out of business.”

    Gary Cox, General Counsel for the Fund, states that “USDA and MDA have exceeded their authority and they have completely failed to follow the proper procedures. We are calling on the agencies to immediately halt implementation of the program or face appropriate action.”

    About The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund: The Fund’s mission is to defend the freedoms and to broaden the rights of sustainable farmers and their consumers to produce and consume local, nutrient-dense foods. Concerned citizens can support the Fund by joining at or by contacting the Fund at 703-208-FARM. The Fund’s sister organization, the Farm-to-Consumer Foundation (, works to support farmers engaged in sustainable farm stewardship and promote consumer access to local, nutrient-dense food..

    Editor’s Note: The Notice of Intent to Sue the (USDA) and (MDA) is available at



    Taaron G. Meikle

    President, Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund and Farm-to-Consumer Foundation


    Brian Cummings

    Cummings & Company LLC


  3. Mocha Mom says:

    I admit to not being well-informed on this issue, but I am glad to see that someone is pushing the government for full-disclosure. I learned from a fight over construction of a new school building that although objections to what may sound like a good idea at first blush seem unwarranted, further study may reveal fatal flaws in the original plan that can be corrected, making the plan acceptable to everyone.

Leave a Reply